Thursday, February 11, 2016

Cancer risks from LOW-LET exposure

This is a summary of the reading I have done on section 3.5.3 in Radiological Assessment: Sources and Doses. It is interesting how far we have come in the world of radiation exposure and how we now use it for good things such as cancer treatment. 

There is lots of evidence that large of ionizing radiation is a possible cause of cancer. This happens by the radiation damaging a strand of DNA, the damage small enough to let the DNA reproduce. Data for cancer risk has been obtained through the study of many groups of people.

The people that were near Nagasaki and Hiroshima were exposed to gamma and neutron radiation. These people and their off spring have been studied throughout the years. Radiologists from the first half of the century received abnormally high doses due to the limited knowledge of radiation shielding and the negative effects of large doses. “Radium Dial Painters” ingested large amounts of radium because they would periodically dab the paintbrush on their tongue to wet it. The radium was used for luminescence on gauges and watches. Radiation therapy patients have also been monitored for effects.

As of now, there is no direct evidence that chronic exposure to low radiation will lead to an abnormally high risk of cancer.  There are models that will relate exposure to an increase in cancer risk. The two models noted are the Absolute Risk Model and the Relative Risk Model. These use tables of mortality rates of cancers based on gender and age, as well as dose received to calculate the increased risk of cancer. There are also concepts such as the Genetically Significant Dose, which is described as a “measure of the genetic detriment to a population”. The somatically significant dose a “measure of biological hazard in relation to somatic illness, specifically fatal malignancy”. I am going to look into these a bit more because I find them to be a little unclear in the explanation.

For more information on these methods, look into the BEIR-V and the UNSCEAR committees. Or you can just read this section of the book. Hope you found this interesting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The Nuclear Cow                         

2 comments:

  1. This was a pretty informative post. I think that it would be pretty cool in the future to pick one of these topics and elaborate a little more on it. Like what trends did they or did they not find in the radium dial painters? That's something I hadn't really heard of before and would be interested in the findings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It would seem that all the radium girls passed by the end of the 30's. Here is an article that digs into it a bit further. I would summarize it, but there is a giant disclaimer that says you must have permission to use any information from the article lol.

    http://www.damninteresting.com/undark-and-the-radium-girls/

    ReplyDelete